![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value
Recovery and the Small Forest Owner
Article ID : FLS0302
Published
: Forest Logger and
Sawmiller, March 02
Author : Craig Penfold, Project
Manager, Interpine Forestry
These days as a forest grower and owner you will often hear quoted comments from forest marketing specialists and stumpage purchasers such as :
"we'll sell your trees for more money"
"maximise your return per hectare"
"don't sell your forest in the dark"
Normally
these statements are well founded, as significant gains can be made by utilizing
an independent specialist with vast knowledge in evaluating, marketing and
harvesting your stand of trees. However one key aspect that not only leaves
the seller in the dark but also marketing specialists and purchasers is
"how much value did we actually recover in relation to the full potential
recoverable value that was once standing".
By and large the difference between the potential and actual recoverable
value is primarily influenced by three key variables:
The degree to which each of these variables independently influences the financial returns to the forest owner is always very blurred. Such comments as "the pre-harvest inventory data was incorrect", "the harvesting crew did not recover the value" and "the market dropped out" are commonplace when predicted outcomes are not met.
The good
news is that systems and tools now exist that allow forest owners to accurately
reconcile the influences of pre-harvest inventory data, harvesting operations
and market conditions on their financial returns. By benchmarking
the actual recovered value against what can now be accurately measured as
the true recoverable value forest growers can improve their returns by 8
- 22%.
* due to the nature of the Internet we can not guarantee links outside of our website - we will however attempt to ensure they are kept up to date. You can notify us of link problems via our feedback form.